Wikipedia

★★★★★ I love this app whenever I need to find something out Wikipedia gives me the information I need thank you so much Wikipedia

★★★★★ Used every day, never once failed to meet expectations of function, style, usability, and clarity of UI. Wiki is one of humanity's great treasures, I feel, and this app is concomitant with the simple effectiveness one expects from Wiki. Love it.

★★★★★ There is always a scope for improvements. Wikipedia is a free knowledge sharing for the world. Thanks for the nice app 👍

★★★★★ There's a bug that shows you the older cover photo of an article you were reading when you open a new article from an external link. I was reading about Irish Potato Famine, then 8 hours later I wanted to read about Lunchly. I navigated to Lunchly using Google, and the app showed me the Irish Potato Famine photo on Lunchly. Honestly, it's not a bug it's the truth.

★★☆☆☆ Just a suggestion please integrate the commons app into or inside the Wikipedia app. It would be very useful and greatly appreciated It would facilitate the usage of the app. Instead of us searching or skewing two apps. We could use only one app. And it would greatly facilitate or searches and everything else, and it would follow that searches would much easier. Please integrate the commons' app in the Wikipedia app.

★★☆☆☆ Wikipedia is free, and it's a good place to get information but to many times there are mistakes which even I notice or not complete information about something, but they say it's complete. I know fact checking every article written on Wikipedia is almost impossible. I can't give more than one star because when I read something I want it to be correct. I don't know what percentage of articles have been fact-checked and are 100 percent correct so would be nice to know that

★★☆☆☆ For a large portion of my life, Wikipedia has been a trusted source of information. Now I can't help but notice Information being deliberately hidden to promote their own bias. Ever heard of sweet baby inc? They have made numerous racist statements. Yet the only mention of this on their page is to the backlash received in response. Not a single word describe why the backlash occurred. And of course the page is "protected against vandalism"...

★★☆☆☆ I don't understand why the hyperlinks have to be DARK blue in color. It's practically unreadable in the dark mode, where, of course, the background is also DARK.